Dynamics of early rehabilitation care for children with autism spectrum disorder using the DIR/Floortime approach at St. Luke’s Center for Health and Development

   This article analyzes the dynamics of early comprehensive psychological and pedagogical care for children aged 3 years with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) using the DIR/Floortime approach. The experimental group included 18 ASD patients aged 3 years who attended a special program in Svt. Luka’s Center for Health and Development (Moscow) on a regular basis (2–3 times a week). The comprehensive program included weekly individual classes of 4 types: Floortime therapy, kinesotherapy with elements of sensory integration, game speech therapist-defectologist, and sensory-gaming group. The control group included 19 ASD patients aged 3 years who did not attend special classes. We used the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS) and Functional Emotional Assessment Scale (FEAS) for examination. Children were examined at baseline and after 3 months. We found that children from the experimental group had a significant positive dynamics in their communication skills, daily living skills, motor development, desire for emotional contact, communicative initiative, and two-way interaction. Children from the control group did not demonstrate any significant dynamics of these parameters.

1. Ayres A. J. Sensory integration and the child. Understanding hidden development problems. Moscow: Terevinf, 2009. 272 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bowlby J. Attachment. Moscow: Gardariki, 2003. 477 p. (In Russ.)

3. Greenspan S., Wieder S. Engaging autism: using the floortime approach to help children relate, communicate, and think. Moscow: Terevinf, 2013. 512 p. (In Russ.)

4. Romanovskiy N. V., Azirova A. A. Child and family in the DIR/Floortime approach. Psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya semyi = Psychology and Psychotherapy of the Family 2020; (2). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rebenok-i-semya-v-podhode-dir-floortime. (In Russ.)

5. Sayfutdinova L. R., Sudarikova M. A. Assessment of the level of development and adaptation in a child using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale. Shkola zdorovya = Health School 2004;(1): 48–56. (In Russ.)

6. Sayfutdinova L. R. Utility of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale in the diagnosis of autism and Asperger's syndrome (based on foreign publications). Autizm i narusheniya razvitiya = Autism and Developmental Disorders 2003; 2: 51–7. (In Russ.)

7. Sayfutdinova L. R. Features of adaptive behavior of children with different variants of dysontogenesis. Detskiy autizm: issledovaniya i praktika = Children's Autism: Research and Practice 2008:125–32. (In Russ.)

8. Carter A. S., Volkmar F. R., Sparrow S. S. et al. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: the supplementary norms for individuals with autism. J Autism Dev Disord 1998; 28 (4): 287–302. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026056518470

9. Greenspan S. I., De Gangi G., Wieder S. The Functional Emotional Assessment Scale (FEAS). Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders, 2^nd edn, 2003.

10. Hess E. DIR ® /Floortime™ : Evidence based practice towards the treatment of autism and sensory processing disorder in children and adolescents. Int J Child Health Hum Develop 2013; 6 (3). Retrieved from: http://www.centerforthedevelopingmind.com/sites/default/files/IJCHD-2013-6-Hess-Floortime.pdf

11. Romanovsky N. V., Itskovich G., Strikha O. E. Trialability of FEAS Structured Observation Scale on a Sample of Russian-Speaking Children. In: Education of Children with Special Needs. Springer, 2022. 480 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-13646-7