Analysis of the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of infantile spasms and focal epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex
https://doi.org/10.17650/2073-8803-2018-13-3-36-44
Abstract
Background. Adequate selection of the 1st antiepileptic drug (AED) is an obligatory condition for the successful treatment of epilepsy. It is well known that the first drug in the treatment of infantile spasms (IS) in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is vigabatrin (VGB). With regard to focal seizures (FS) in TSC, there are certain differences: some authors insist on VGB (P. Curatolo, 2012), others as the first choice drugs are mentioning carbamazepine and valproate (A. Saxena, 2015). Data in general on the possible effectiveness of medical treatment of epilepsy in TSC, and the effectiveness of different AEDs are also contradictory.
Objective: to make a comparative evaluation of the efficacy of various AEDs in the treatment of epilepsy in patients with TC.
Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients hospitalized with epilepsy and TSC in the Department of Epileptology and Psychoneurology, Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics named after Yu.E Vel’tishev of N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, for the last 2 years was completed. Efficacy analysis was conducted in 134 patients (91 (67.9 %) with FS and 43 (32.1 %) with IS). Efficacy was estimated as the remission of epileptic seizures during 6 months. The percentage of patients with remission was also evaluated (seizures were stopped for 1 year or more) and percentage of patients with a decrease in the number of seizures. The results of the first monotherapy and the subsequent administration of two and three AEDs were analyzed.
Results. Low efficiency of AEDs in starting monotherapy was noted – the remission of seizures within 6 months on any AED was only 27.5 % (25 from 91) with FS, with IS – 13.9 % (6 from 43). Remission on any 1st AED was observed only in 13.2 % (12 from 91) and 6.9 % (3 from 43), respectively. The effectiveness of individual AED is low, especially in achieving stable remission. So, valproate caused remission of FS in 14 (22.2 %) from 63, but in the future remission was stable only in 11 (17.5 %) from 63. VGB as the first monotherapy proved to be effective in 5 from 6 patients with FS and in 4 from 6 patients with IS. The introduction of the 2nd drug added another 13.3 % and 38.6 % of patients with remission of seizures, the 3rd AED – 7.3 % and 7.7 % in FS and IS, respectively. Most often, an effective drug in additional therapy was VGB. The efficiency of VGB was reduced if it was used not as the first, but as the second and third AED. The percentage of unsuccessful treatment (including combined therapy) is estimated as 51.5 % and 47.8 % of patients with FS and IS, respectively.
Conclusion. Epilepsy associated with TSC is less sensitive to AEDs and gives a smaller percentage of remissions. Perhaps in our country this is due to the difficulties of prescription of VGB as a starting therapy for epilepsy in the patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.
About the Authors
A. V. GrigoryevaRussian Federation
Department of Epileptology and Psychoneurology, Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics named after Yu.E Vel’tishev
2 Taldomskaya St., Moscow 125412
M. Yu. Dorofeeva
Russian Federation
Department of Epileptology and Psychoneurology, Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics named after Yu.E Vel’tishev
2 Taldomskaya St., Moscow 125412
V. S. Perminov
Russian Federation
Department of Epileptology and Psychoneurology, Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics named after Yu.E Vel’tishev
2 Taldomskaya St., Moscow 125412
E. D. Belousova
Russian Federation
Department of Epileptology and Psychoneurology, Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics named after Yu.E Vel’tishev
2 Taldomskaya St., Moscow 125412
References
1. Belousiva E.D. Dorofeeva M.Yu., Pivovarova A.M., Katysheva O.V. Diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry 2015;115(5):46–51. (In Russ.).
2. Curatolo P., Jóźwiak S., Nabbout R., TSC Consensus Meeting for SEGA and Epilepsy Management. Management of epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC): clinical recommendations. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2012;16(6):582–6. PMID: 22695035. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.05.004.
3. Curatolo P., Moavero R., de Vries P.J. Neurological and neuropsychiatric aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex. Lancet Neurol 2015;14(7):733–45. PMID: 26067126. DOI: 10.1016/S14744422(15)00069-1.
4. Cusmai R., Moavero R., Bombardieri R. et al. Long-term neurological outcome in children with early-onset epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis. Epilepsy Behav 2011;22(4):735–9. PMID: 22142783. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.08.037.
5. Fallah A., Guyatt G.H., Snead O.C. et al. Predictors of seizure outcomes in children with tuberous sclerosis complex and intractable epilepsy undergoing resective epilepsy surgery: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2013;8(2):e53565. PMID: 23405072. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053565.
6. Fallah A., Weil A.G., Wang S. et al. Costutility analysis of competing treatment strategies for drug-resistant epilepsy in children with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Epilepsy Behav 2016;63:79–88. PMID: 27591681. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.07.034.
7. Epileptic spasms. Available at: https://www.epilepsydiagnosis.org/seizure/epileptic-spasms-overview.html.
8. Jeong A., Nakagawa J.A., Wong M. Predictors of drug resistant epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex. J Child Neurol 2017;32(14):1092–8. PMID: 29129154. DOI: 10.1177/0883073817737446.
9. Krueger D.A., Northrup H. Tuberous sclerosis complex surveillance and management: recommendations of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatr Neurol 2013;49(4):255–26. PMID: 24053983. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.08.002.
10. Lux A.L., Osborne J.P. A proposal for case definitions and outcome measures in studies of infantile spasms and West syndrome: consensus statement of the West Delphi group. Epilepsia 2004;45(11):1416–28. PMID: 15509243. DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.02404.x.
11. Major P., Thiele E.A. Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy Behav 2008;13(2):357–60. PMID: 18468492. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.04.001.
12. Northrup H., Krueger D.A. Tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria update: recommendations of the 2012 international tuberous sclerosis complex consensus conference. Pediatr Neurol 2013;49(4):243–54.
13. Overwater I.E., Bindels-de Heus K., Rietman A.B. et al. Epilepsy in children with tuberous sclerosis complex: Chance of remission and response to antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia 2015;56(8):1239–45. DOI: 10.1111/epi.13050.
14. Roach E.S., Di Mario F.J., Kandt R.S., Northrup H. Tuberous Sclerosis Consensus Conference: recommendations for diagnostic evaluation. J Child Neur 1999;14(6):401–7. DOI: 10.1177/088307389901400610.
15. Saxena A., Sampson J.R. Epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: phenotypes, mechanisms, and treatments. Semin Neurol 2015;35(3):269–76. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1552616.
16. Scheffer I.E., Berkovic S., Capovilla G. et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 2017;58(4):512–21. DOI: 10.1111/epi.13709.
17. Zhang B., McDaniel S.S., Rensing N.R., Wong M. Vigabatrin inhibits seizures and mTOR pathway activation in a mouse model of tuberous sclerosis complex. PLoS One 2013;8(2);e57445. PMID: 23437388. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057445.
Review
For citations:
Grigoryeva A.V., Dorofeeva M.Yu., Perminov V.S., Belousova E.D. Analysis of the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of infantile spasms and focal epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. Russian Journal of Child Neurology. 2018;13(3):36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2073-8803-2018-13-3-36-44